PRICES include / exclude VAT
Homepage>IEEE Standards>49 AIRCRAFT AND SPACE VEHICLE ENGINEERING>49.090 On-board equipment and instruments>IEEE 836-2009 - IEEE Recommended Practice for Precision Centrifuge Testing of Linear Accelerometers
Sponsored link
Released: 17.09.2009

IEEE 836-2009 - IEEE Recommended Practice for Precision Centrifuge Testing of Linear Accelerometers

IEEE Recommended Practice for Precision Centrifuge Testing of Linear Accelerometers

Format
Availability
Price and currency
English PDF Redline
Immediate download
216.76 EUR
English PDF
Immediate download
158.44 EUR
Withdraw:05.03.2020
Standard number:IEEE 836-2009
Released:17.09.2009
ISBN:978-0-7381-5994-2
Pages:152
Status:Inactive
Language:English
DESCRIPTION

IEEE 836-2009

This recommended practice describes the conduct and analysis of precision tests that are to be performed on linear accelerometers using centrifuge techniques. The term "precision," in this context, refers to tests that are conducted to evaluate accelerometer parameters, as opposed to tests conducted to establish environmental survivability only. Evaluation may take the form of determining the coefficients of the accelerometer's model equation, except for bias and scale factor, which are most accurately determined by static multiposition tests. Alternatively, evaluation may establish only that the accelerometer output complies with specific error limit criteria.

The principal error sources encountered during precision centrifuge testing of linear accelerometers are described, along with the test practices and data reduction techniques that have been found most efficient in minimizing or compensating for them.

Revision Standard - Inactive-Reserved. This recommended practice describes the conduct and analysis of precision tests that are to be performed on linear accelerometers using centrifuge techniques. The term "precision," in this context, refers to tests that are conducted to evaluate accelerometer parameters, as opposed to those conducted to establish environmental survivability only. Evaluation may take the form of determining the coefficients of the accelerometer's model equation, except for bias and scale factor, which are most accurately determined by static multi-position tests. Alternatively, evaluation may only establish that the accelerometer output complies with specific error limit criteria.