IEEE/ANSI C63.12-2015

This recommended practice presents a rationale for developing emission limits and immunity test levels and recommends that these facets are representative of current practice and user needs. Emission limits generally are written by national and international standards bodies. Emission limits for the most part are specified by regulators, which is the case in the U.S. and Canada. Such regulatory limits take precedence, even if the limits are different from those considered in this document. In the U.S. and Canada, product immunity is not regulated except for some safety equipment. In this way, adequate immunity is more a quality aspect of the product as if it does not operate in its intended RF environment, the user would deem it of poor quality. It should be noted that the entire document does not impose normative requirements, but recommends options.

The main purpose of this recommended practice is to aid manufacturers who might need to modify the emissions their products generate (as long as regulatory limits are met) to meet for example intra-system needs for their products. There might also be a need to have different (higher) immunity test levels than what is typically required if the product will be used in severe electromagnetic environments. As the use of electronics is constantly changing (e.g., the Smart Grid [B10]1), the test methods, immunity test levels, and emission limits likewise need to be periodically reviewed to assure that EMC is maintained. In fact, these EMC considerations might have to be tailored for specific designs and go beyond regulatory requirements to ensure proper product operation at the user location, which is exposed to a myriad of RF environments and where it is likely that there are other electronic products that might suffer interference from RF generated by the product. The emissions and immunity measurement technique used can have an impact on the accuracy, repeatability, and reproducibility of the test results. Emissions from products should be controlled to protect radio services by not causing interference, and at the same time, products should have sufficient immunity to be able to operate as intended in the RF environments expected in locations where the products are intended to be used.

Revision Standard - Active. A rationale and recommendations for developing emission limits and immunity test levels are presented in this recommended practice. These limits and levels are representative of current practice and user needs. Emission limits are specified by national and international standards bodies. Emission limits for the most part are regulated and hence controlled, which is the case in the U.S. and Canada. Such regulatory limits take precedence, even if the limits are different from those considered in this document. For product immunity, while in some parts of the world this is regulated, for the U.S. and Canada, it is not regulated except for some types of safety equipment. In this way, adequate immunity is more a quality aspect of the product because it does not operate in its intended RF environment, the user would deem it of poor design and quality. The immunity test levels described in this document are representative of common levels applied internationally. However, severe environments (in which levels of electromagnetic disturbance are high) require the consideration of applying higher test levels. This consideration is described in this recommended practice. Finally, it should be noted that the entire recommended practice does not contain normative requirements, as such practices remain optional.