PRICES include / exclude VAT
Homepage>BS Standards>13 ENVIRONMENT. HEALTH PROTECTION. SAFETY>13.220 Protection against fire>13.220.01 Protection against fire in general>PD ISO/TR 16732-3:2013 Fire safety engineering. Fire risk assessment Example of an industrial property
Sponsored link
immediate downloadReleased: 2013-05-31
PD ISO/TR 16732-3:2013 Fire safety engineering. Fire risk assessment Example of an industrial property

PD ISO/TR 16732-3:2013

Fire safety engineering. Fire risk assessment Example of an industrial property

Format
Availability
Price and currency
English Secure PDF
Immediate download
266.20 EUR
You can read the standard for 1 hour. More information in the category: E-reading
Reading the standard
for 1 hour
26.62 EUR
You can read the standard for 24 hours. More information in the category: E-reading
Reading the standard
for 24 hours
79.86 EUR
English Hardcopy
In stock
266.20 EUR
Standard number:PD ISO/TR 16732-3:2013
Pages:32
Released:2013-05-31
ISBN:978 0 580 80188 4
Status:Standard
DESCRIPTION

PD ISO/TR 16732-3:2013


This standard PD ISO/TR 16732-3:2013 Fire safety engineering. Fire risk assessment is classified in these ICS categories:
  • 13.220.01 Protection against fire in general

This part of ISO/TR 16732 deals with a fictitious propane storage facility dedicated to the reception of propane transported by tank wagons, the storage of propane in a pressurized vessel and the bulk shipment of propane by tank trucks. The fire risk assessment developed in this part of ISO/TR 16732 is not intended to be exhaustive, but is given as an example to illustrate the application of ISO 16732-1 to an industrial facility.

The scope of this part of ISO/TR 16732 is further limited to design-phase strategies, including changes to the layout of the facility and selection of relevant fire safety strategies (implementation of risk reduction measures). Not included are strategies that operate during the operation phase, including process modifications.

This part of ISO/TR 16732 illustrates the value of fire risk assessment because multiple scenarios are analysed, and several design options are available, which may perform well or not depending on the considered scenario. Risk estimation is needed to determine the result of these different combinations, and overall measures of performance that can be compared between design options. If there were only one scenario of interest, or if the options all tended to perform the same way on all the scenarios, then a simpler type of engineering analysis would suffice.